WORLD / Health
Study: Vitamin D reduces cancer risk
(AP)
Updated: 2007-06-08 13:15
OMAHA, Neb. - Building hope for one pill to prevent many cancers, vitamin
D cut the risk of several types of cancer by 60 percent overall for older
women in the most rigorous study yet.
The new research strengthens the case made by some specialists that
vitamin D may be a powerful cancer preventive and most people should get
more of it. Experts remain split, though, on how much to take.
"The findings ... are a breakthrough of great medical and public health
importance," declared Cedric Garland, a prominent vitamin D researcher at
the University of California-San Diego. "No other method to prevent
cancer has been identified that has such a powerful impact."
While the most reliable yet, the study does have drawbacks. It was
designed mainly to monitor how calcium and vitamin D improve bone health,
and the number of cancer cases overall was small, showing up in just 50
patients.
"It's a very small study," said Dr. Edward Giovannucci, who researches
nutrition and cancer at the Harvard School of Public Health. "I don't
think it's the last word."
In either case, the study takes an important step in extending several
decades of research that began with observations that cancer rates among
similar groups of people were lower in southern latitudes than in
northern ones. Scientists reasoned that had to do with more direct
sunlight in southern regions.
The skin makes vitamin D when exposed to sunlight's ultraviolet rays.
This study used that same form of the vitamin, known as D3 or
cholecalciferol. Multivitamins usually carry a much weaker variant known
as D2, but D3 is available in stand-alone dietary supplements.
Earlier research has shown that vitamin D helps regulate cell growth, a
fundamental biological process that goes haywire in cancer. Most other
supplements have tended to target specific types of disease in early
testing, like selenium or vitamin E for prostate cancer.
This study, published Friday in the American Journal of Clinical
Nutrition, is the first time that researchers significantly boosted --
and measured -- blood levels of vitamin D and then followed identical
groups of patients from start to finish.
That's why, despite its modest size, the research was generating
excitement. Nearly all other work has compared disparate groups of
patients.
The researchers at Creighton University in Omaha focused on 1,179
seemingly healthy women with an average age of 67. The women were divided
into three groups: 446 got calcium and vitamin D3 supplements, a similar
number got calcium alone, and 288 took dummy pills.
The research team gave 1,000 daily international units of vitamin D, more
than current guidelines calling for 200 to 600 units depending on a
person's age.
The researchers intended to check mainly for the effects of calcium on
bone health. Their interest in cancer risk was secondary.
But the lower cancer risk stood out. Only 13 women, or 3 percent,
developed cancer over four years of calcium and vitamin D supplements.
With calcium alone, 17 women, or 4 percent, got cancer. With dummy pills,
cancer appeared in 20 women, or 7 percent.
That shows a 60 percent lower cancer risk over four years in the group
taking both supplements, compared to patients taking placebos. And when
the first-year cancers were excluded -- the ones mostly likely present
before the study began -- the findings were stronger still: a 77 percent
lower risk for the combo group.
While the calcium-only group lowered its four-year cancer risk by 47
percent compared to the untreated group, it did no better when early
cancers were excluded. That suggests calcium alone may have done little
in this experiment, the researchers said.
Experts reviewing the study focused on vitamin D as the powerful agent in
the combo group, but it can't be ruled out that calcium might somehow
amplify the effect of vitamin D.
While numbers were limited, these women developed a broad range of
cancers, including disease of the breast, colon, lungs and blood. Dr.
Michael Holick, of Boston University Medical Center, who sat on the
professional panel that issued the 1997 guidelines for vitamin D, said
this study shows that enough vitamin D "markedly reduces the risk of
developing the most serious deadly cancers."
He supports raising the recommended amount of the vitamin and said 1,000
daily units of vitamin D3 would now be reasonable for most people.
On the other hand, Dr. Michael Thun of the American Cancer Society favors
keeping the current recommendation of 200 to 600 IUs for now. And he
cautioned that more than 2,000 units is viewed in the guidelines as
potentially dangerous.
Joan Lappe, the study's lead researcher, said it "just adds to the great
bunch of evidence that we need to have better vitamin D nutrition." Some
foods carry the vitamin, like salmon, tuna and fortified milk, but diet
accounts for little of the vitamin circulating in the body. Overexposure
to the sun can cause skin cancer.
Still, people should consult their doctors before boosting their vitamin
dosage, several experts also warned.
More study is needed to determine if the effects in this study hold true
for large groups of people and men as well as women.
Top World News
� US death toll in Iraq passes 3,500
� 3 Turk soldiers killed in security zone
� Putin suggests new missile shield site
� Cyclone Gonu blamed for 23 deaths
� G-8 leaders agree on climate
Today's Top News
� Fewer executions after legal reform
� China,India agree to work more closely
� Putin suggests new missile shield site
� US death toll in Iraq passes 3,500
� HK Basic Law 'guarantees democracy'
Most Commented/Read Stories in 48 Hours
Learn Chinese, Chinese Course, Chinese Mandarin, Learning Materials, Mandarin audio lessons, Chinese writing lessons, Chinese vocabulary lists, About chinese characters, News in Chinese, Go to China, Travel to China, Study in China, Teach in China, Dictionaries, Learn Chinese Painting, Your name in Chinese, Chinese calligraphy, Chinese songs, Chinese proverbs, Chinese poetry, Chinese tattoo, Beijing 2008 Olympics, Mandarin Phrasebook, Chinese editor, Pinyin editor, China Travel, Travel to Beijing, Travel to Tibet
No comments:
Post a Comment